Don’t Overlook Justice Clarence Thomas’ Concurrence In Racial Gerrymandering Case

In Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court struck a major blow against race-based policymaking, holding that the law protects voters from discrimination, rather than mandating that states create racial gerrymanders as an ostensible corrective to discrimination. The decision builds on a string of cases whereby the Roberts Court has distinguished itself by rightly opposing present […]
Source
The Federalist
Opens original article in a new tab



